He was "Justicier consistorial de Constantine" in 1694, at which time he married Jeanne Marguerite Jordan. The marriage contract, recorded 13 apr 1694 by David Tavel (notary at Payerne, ACV DP 101/1 fol. 132) notes the presence of two nephews, David Gachet, current Banderet of Payer, and Joseph Guillermin. Also present were Salomon Comte, former Banderet, and the notary, "son beaufrere". These relationships are explained by a marriage contract recorded 16 may 1685 by David Tavel, notary at Payerne (ACV DP 101), in which Samuel de Trey, father of the bride Magdelaine de Trey, notes that he has set aside equal dowries for his three daughters, on the wife of the notary himself, another the wife of Abraham Desibord, juge consistorial of Villars, and the third Magdelaine, subject of the contract.
__
|
__|
| |
| |__
|
_Abraham DESSIBORD __|
| |
| | __
| | |
| |__|
| |
| |__
|
|
|--Abraham DESSIBORD
|
| __
| |
| __|
| | |
| | |__
| |
|_____________________|
|
| __
| |
|__|
|
|__
Was he the same Abraham Dessibord of Villars-en-Vully whose son Abraham figures in the history of the Gachet family?
[14963] Date of contract, Samuel Marcuard notary.
__
|
__|
| |
| |__
|
_Abraham DESSIBORD __|
| |
| | __
| | |
| |__|
| |
| |__
|
|
|--Jeanne DESSIBORD
|
| __
| |
| __|
| | |
| | |__
| |
|_____________________|
|
| __
| |
|__|
|
|__
Apparently, her sister Jeanne married one of the David Gachet's.
(ID #I20800)
Consacrated in 1751, suffragant at Orbe 1753, at Bercher 1754-1758, "stationnaire" 1759-1760, pastor at Tavannes 1761-1763, at Villars-le-Grand 1763-1764, deacon at Payerne 1764, at Lucens 1764-1769, pastor at Moudon 1769-1776, at Constantine 1776-1790, at Meyriez 1790-1796.
________________________
|
_David DESSONNAZ ____|
| |
| |________________________
|
_Jean Jaques DESSONNAZ _|
| (1684 - 1755) |
| | ________________________
| | |
| |_____________________|
| |
| |________________________
|
|
|--Abraham Henri DESSONNAZ
| (1727 - 1796)
| _Pierre DUTOIT _________
| | (.... - 1664)
| _Isaac DUTOIT _______|
| | (.... - 1731) m 1681|
| | |_Marie Dorothée BUTTET _+
| | (.... - 1670)
|_Jeanne Marie DUTOIT ___|
(.... - 1796) |
| _Sébastien DUBRIT ______
| | m 1655
|_Claudine DUBRIT ____|
(.... - 1726) m 1681|
|_Marie CAVIN ___________
m 1655
(ID #I5933)
Consacrated in 1749, suffragant at Meyriez under his father 1754-1755, at Fiez 1757, subdeacon at Lausanne 1757-1758, pastor at Villars-le-Grand 1758-1763, at Combremont 1763-1791.
________________________
|
_David DESSONNAZ ____|
| |
| |________________________
|
_Jean Jaques DESSONNAZ _|
| (1684 - 1755) |
| | ________________________
| | |
| |_____________________|
| |
| |________________________
|
|
|--Jean Isaac DESSONNAZ
| (1724 - 1791)
| _Pierre DUTOIT _________
| | (.... - 1664)
| _Isaac DUTOIT _______|
| | (.... - 1731) m 1681|
| | |_Marie Dorothée BUTTET _+
| | (.... - 1670)
|_Jeanne Marie DUTOIT ___|
(.... - 1796) |
| _Sébastien DUBRIT ______
| | m 1655
|_Claudine DUBRIT ____|
(.... - 1726) m 1681|
|_Marie CAVIN ___________
m 1655
(ID #I5932)
Consacrated in 1712, suffragant at Meyriez 1713-1718, regent (schoolmaster) at Moudon 1718-1726, pastor at Saint-Cierges 1726-1762, at Meyriez 1752-1755. Three of his sons were ministers.
__
|
__|
| |
| |__
|
_David DESSONNAZ ____|
| |
| | __
| | |
| |__|
| |
| |__
|
|
|--Jean Jaques DESSONNAZ
| (1684 - 1755)
| __
| |
| __|
| | |
| | |__
| |
|_____________________|
|
| __
| |
|__|
|
|__
Bernhard von Gélieu, in Le déstin des Gélieu, notes existence of marriage contract dated 18 dec 1621 at the Archives Cantonales Vaudoises. Someday we may actually find it in the records of the notaries! Three children are known.
[14755]
Contract of 18 dec 1621 cited in "Le déstin des Gélieu", but the name of the notary is not reported in this source.
__
|
__|
| |
| |__
|
_Jean Benoict DESTALLENS _|
| |
| | __
| | |
| |__|
| |
| |__
|
|
|--Estienna DESTALLENS
| (1605 - 1626)
| __
| |
| __|
| | |
| | |__
| |
|_Marie DELALORE __________|
|
| __
| |
|__|
|
|__
(ID #I8378)
Deacon at La Tour-de-Peilz 1588-1589, at Lausanne 1589-1597, at Pully 1597-1601, and minister at Corsier 1611-1613. Where was he between Pully and Corsier? Where was his daughter born? Where did Samuel Gélieu meet him and marry his daughter? Records at Lausanne and Pully should be checked.
Resident of Vevey at the time of her marriage.
There is at least one document that suggests a possible identity for the father of the brothers Perretus and Johannes de Tecto. The terrier ACV Fn 310 (fol. 290) contains a donation of a cense to the Hospitale Pauperum Beate Marie Virginis de Melduno by Vuilliermus dictus May de Chavanes supra Meldunum,, secured by a part of a house in Moudon, dated die Lune post festum Beati Michaelis, 1329. The house was in Mauborget, juxta postelam Broye prope domum Berthodi Serracem. By 31 aug 1356 (fol. 291v), apparently the same parcel, now described as 2/3 of a house, the rest of the description essentially identical and for the same cense, was in the hands of Uldricus Marion of Chavannes, who had recently (de novo) purchased it from Stephanus de Tecto son of the late Perreti de Tecto dicti de Ogo de Chavanes supra Meldunum. Stephanus by this time was living in Romont. There is another version, or perhaps the original of this document in the Archives communales de Moudon (ACM M 58, 457, dated 13 aug 1356—note the transposition of the date), apparently identical (although described in the inventory in French, but again specifying that Marion had just purchased it—vient d'acquérir—from Stephanus) with the exception that Stephanus is here said to have been living in Estavayer-le-Lac. The document in Moudon has not been examined. Moreover, the ACM apparently has the original document that was copied into Fn 310, fol. 290 (ACM M 58, 77, 02 oct 1329, "Guillaume May, de Chavannes-sur-Moudon, donne en aumône à l'hôpital de la Vierge une cense d'une coupe de messel assignée sur sa part d'une maison en Mauzborget jouxte la poterne de la Broye près la maison de Berthold Saraceni"). In any case, the documents of 1356 specify that the house, or at least this 2/3 of the house, had been donated in this way to the hospital by the Dutoit of Chavannes ("illi de Tecto de Chavanes supra Meldunum"). If the cense on 2/3 of the house was and had always been "una cupa medii frumenti ad mensuram Melduni", it seems unlikely that the cense on the remainder of the house would have been the same amount of grain, and the implication is that the two documents do indeed pertain to the same part of the same house, and that Vuilliermus dictus May was in fact a member of the de Tecto family, and that he died after 1329. The situation might be clearer if some mention of the other 1/3 of the house could be located.
While the donation by Vuilliermus dictus May is not specifically a testamentary bequest, and while it mentions some sort of previous arrangement (a partagium) regarding the parties that shared the house, it does state that it is intended as a charitable donation, motivated by piety: "intuiti pietatis pro remedio anime mee et predecessorum meorum". However, what was being donated was not a specific sum, but rather, a perpetual rent or cense, which his heirs would have been obliged to continue, or else, with the approval of the rector of the hospital, pay to redeem. Thus, there must have been some further proceedings by his heirs after his death, in the form of a reconnaissance indicating how those heirs or later tenants would continue to pay the cense that he had donated to the hospital. Depending on how such a document had been worded, it might have involved the heirs of Vuilliermus making an agreement among themselves and with the rector of the hospital as to which of them would be responsible for the cense, and such an agreement would conceivably lead to the statement in 1356 that the cense had been donated by "those of the Dutoit family" (illi de Tecto). Notably, by 1356, one of the parties that had become liable for the cense was Stephanus de Tecto, son of Perretus. The simplest explanation is that Perretus was an heir of Vuilliermus, or, failing that possibility, Stephanus was related to Vuilliermus and had obtained that part of the house from someone else in the de Tecto family.
__
|
__|
| |
| |__
|
_Vuilliermus DETECTO _|
| (.... - 1502) |
| | __
| | |
| |__|
| |
| |__
|
|
|--Agnes DETECTO
| (.... - 1502)
| __
| |
| __|
| | |
| | |__
| |
|_Agnes _____ _________|
(.... - 1502) |
| __
| |
|__|
|
|__
Cited in ACV P Cerjat (I) B 584, deceased as of die Lune post festum Omnium Sanctorum 1345, father of Roletus de Tecto.
_Johannes DETECTO ___
| (1275 - 1344)
_Jaquetus (Jacobus) DETECTO _|
| |
| |_____________________
|
_Johannes (Johannodus) DETECTO _|
| (.... - 1361) |
| | _____________________
| | |
| |_Nycola _____ _______________|
| (.... - 1361) |
| |_____________________
|
|
|--Anthonius DETECTO
|
| _____________________
| |
| _____________________________|
| | |
| | |_____________________
| |
|________________________________|
|
| _____________________
| |
|_____________________________|
|
|_____________________
See ACV P Loys 304, dated 11 oct 1404, where Anthonius Cular de Chavanes supra Meldunum recognizes an obligation for rents on two properties. His wife is identified as Johanneta in P Cerjat (I) B 317, dated 24 apr 1396. Likely the same Anthonius Cular is also mentioned as an adjacent land holder in P Cerjat (I) B 627, but such descriptions are sometimes outdated. By 1433, he had definitely died, P Cerjat (I) B 749, at which time his son Johannes, with approval of his wife Johanneta, abandons various properties at Chavannes, Vuarmarens, Montet, Vauderens, Ursy, Brenles, Chesalles, and Burinaux, most of which remain to be investigated. Also mentioned are two other sons, Nicodus and Aymo. A number of the properties are adjacent to those held by the heirs of the late Nicodus de Tecto, whose identity has not been established.
__
|
_Anselmus DETECTO ___|
| (.... - 1345) |
| |__
|
_Roletus (Cular) DETECTO _|
| (.... - 1382) |
| | __
| | |
| |_____________________|
| |
| |__
|
|
|--Anthonius (Cular) DETECTO
| (.... - 1433)
| __
| |
| _Aubertus DE COSTEL _|
| | |
| | |__
| |
|_Beatrix DE COSTEL _______|
|
| __
| |
|_____________________|
|
|__
__
|
______ DETECTO ______|
| (1276 - ....) |
| |__
|
_Johannes DETECTO ___|
| (1298 - 1343) m 1347|
| | __
| | |
| |_____________________|
| |
| |__
|
|
|--Aubertus DETECTO
| (1318 - ....)
| __
| |
| _____________________|
| | |
| | |__
| |
|_Jordana _____ ______|
m 1347 |
| __
| |
|_____________________|
|
|__
_Anselmus DETECTO ___
| (.... - 1345)
_Roletus (Cular) DETECTO _|
| (.... - 1382) |
| |_____________________
|
_Anthonius (Cular) DETECTO _|
| (.... - 1433) |
| | _Aubertus DE COSTEL _
| | |
| |_Beatrix DE COSTEL _______|
| |
| |_____________________
|
|
|--Aymo (Cular) DETECTO
| (.... - 1433)
| _____________________
| |
| __________________________|
| | |
| | |_____________________
| |
|_Johanneta _____ ___________|
|
| _____________________
| |
|__________________________|
|
|_____________________
__
|
_Williermus DETECTO _|
| |
| |__
|
_Clemens DETECTO ____|
| (1320 - 1386) |
| | __
| | |
| |_____________________|
| |
| |__
|
|
|--Beatrix DETECTO
|
| __
| |
| _____________________|
| | |
| | |__
| |
|_____________________|
|
| __
| |
|_____________________|
|
|__
______ DETECTO ______
| (1276 - ....)
_Perretus (Grant or de Ogo) DETECTO _|
| (1296 - 1343) |
| |_____________________
|
_Johannes (Johannetus) DETECTO _|
| |
| | _____________________
| | |
| |_____________________________________|
| |
| |_____________________
|
|
|--Brusseta DETECTO
|
| _____________________
| |
| _____________________________________|
| | |
| | |_____________________
| |
|________________________________|
|
| _____________________
| |
|_____________________________________|
|
|_____________________
According to the terrier ACV Ab 6 (1358-1361, fol. 26v), daughter of Vyonetus or Vyonerius (the script is ambiguous about the endings -etus and -erius) de Tecto. In the same terrier (fol. 27v), there is also a Broyseta, this one the daugher of Johannetus or Johannerius de Tecto, wife of Girardus de Botens. The same Broyseta, or a different one? The script is clear enough to establish that this is not a misreading. At length, the evidence leads to the conclusion that they are not the same Broyseta or Brusseta.
In the next later terrier, Fk 2, fols. 120 and 120v (1386), there are isolated mentions of a Jaqueta, daughter of Broeyseta de Tecto (and this Jaqueta is apparently the wife of Johannes Barat, or else Barat is the wife of Broeyseta, the script is ambiguous), and property held by Briseta, daughter of Johannes de Tecto. The properties mentioned in these references need to be compared, but it seems most logical that the two mentions in Fk 2 pertain to a second Brusseta, daughter of Johannetus, Johannerius, or Johannes de Tecto. In fact, the connection made clear in another terrier, Fn 5, fol. 3, for Roletus Culardi, Clemens de Tecto, Johannes de Tecto, Broeyseta filia Johannis de Tecto quondam nominibus suis et Roleti de Tecto filii Perrodi de Tecto et certorum condivisorum de Tecto, 01 sep 1379. The shared property is a short roadway or path from which their properties are accessed. From the context, the properties were likely held by a single family, and were divided among the descendants at some point. For example, it may be that the known ancestors of these parties were brothers; Roletus is the son of Ansermus de Tecto, Clemens of Williermus de Tecto, etc.
The key to this second Brusseta, and to a Jaqueta who was the niece of Stephanus de Tecto, son of Perretus, may be in reconciling several different citations that should probably refer to the same parties or their descendants. Among these are P Cerjat (I) B 269, 270 (both from 1360), and 366 (19 mar 1395), each involving the same three properties. Among the parties that can be followed through these three reconnaissances (and a few others that mention the same individuals but which are not directly connected through the same specific properties) are Brusseta daughter of Johannes de Tecto, wife of Girardus de Botens, and their daughter Jaqueta, who is the wife of Johannes Barat. Now, P Cerjat (I) B 270 further specifies that this Jaqueta is the niece of Stephanus de Tecto, thus demonstrating that Stephanus must have had a brother Johannes, a conclusion that is consistent with the circumstantial evidence that connected Stephanus to a Perretus de Tecto, who, in other records not mentioning Stephanus, had sons Perrodus and Johannes.
This evidence strongly suggests that the present Brusseta was not the wife of Johannes Barat, and that there were in fact two different Brussetas.
__
|
__|
| |
| |__
|
_Vionnetus DETECTO __|
| |
| | __
| | |
| |__|
| |
| |__
|
|
|--Brusseta DETECTO
| (.... - 1361)
| __
| |
| __|
| | |
| | |__
| |
|_____________________|
|
| __
| |
|__|
|
|__
Named as adjacent land holder in 1345 (ACV P Cerjat (I) B 584. According to the terrier Ab 6 (1358-1361, fol. 26v), son of Williermus de Tecto. He is apparently the same Clemens de Tecto whose properties were enumerated in the terrier Fk 2, fol. 119 and elsewhere. The various properties in these references have not yet been compared.
P Cerjat (I) B 1480 (dated in 1351) concerns a house at Chavannes, leased by Clemens filius Williermi de Tecto from Stephanus filius Petri (presumably an error for Perreti) de Tecto. On one side of this house is another house belonging to Clemens, and on the opposite side, a house belonging to Roletus de Tecto and his wife Beatrix. The fact that the three houses are in a row suggests that they were all once part of the same property, but the description lacks any toponyms that might permit identification of the house or houses in earlier records.
His daughters and heirs Beatrix and Perrussona are mentioned in the terrier Fn 9, 1403-1406. The implication is that there were no male heirs from this line.
__
|
__|
| |
| |__
|
_Williermus DETECTO _|
| |
| | __
| | |
| |__|
| |
| |__
|
|
|--Clemens DETECTO
| (1320 - 1386)
| __
| |
| __|
| | |
| | |__
| |
|_____________________|
|
| __
| |
|__|
|
|__
Protestant minister.